June 6, 2023

Exploring the Promise and Limitations of Polygenic Risk Scores in Assessing Heart Disease Risk

Genetic Testing Offers Insights into Personalized Heart Disease Prevention Strategies

Medical professionals are constantly seeking innovative approaches to accurately assess a person’s risk of heart disease. While blood tests, CT scans, and electrocardiograms have been conventional methods, a new tool is rapidly gaining popularity: polygenic risk scores. This cutting-edge genetic testing technique analyzes an individual’s genes to identify variants that can indicate their susceptibility to specific diseases, including heart disease, cancer, diabetes, and Alzheimer’s.

Introduced in the mid-2000s, polygenic risk scores have revolutionized the field of personalized medicine. By evaluating hundreds to thousands of genes associated with a specific health concern, medical experts can uncover valuable insights into an individual’s risk profile. Although each genetic variant may contribute only a fraction to the overall risk, the combined effect provides a comprehensive understanding of the likelihood of developing heart disease, especially the blockages in coronary arteries.

Undergoing polygenic risk score testing is relatively simple and painless, typically involving a blood test or cheek swab to extract DNA samples. These samples are then analyzed to generate a score indicating the individual’s risk of developing heart disease or other related conditions. The results empower medical professionals to devise tailored management plans based on an individual’s unique genetic signature.

Polygenic risk scores enable physicians to recommend closer monitoring and more frequent check-ups for individuals with a high risk score for heart disease. This proactive approach facilitates early detection and intervention, potentially reducing the impact of the disease. Moreover, these scores help doctors determine the timing and intensity of preventive measures for those with an increased likelihood of future cardiac arrest, enabling targeted interventions for optimal outcomes.

Patients who undergo polygenic risk score testing gain a deeper understanding of their risk profile, allowing them to make informed decisions about lifestyle modifications that can mitigate the risk of developing heart disease. Real-life examples demonstrate how individuals with high polygenic risk scores have successfully improved their diets, increased physical activity, or quit smoking to minimize the occurrence of heart events.

Despite its potential benefits, polygenic risk scores are not without limitations. It is crucial to interpret the results cautiously, considering other risk factors and in the context of an individual’s overall health profile. While some studies validate the reliability of polygenic risk scores, others suggest alternative tests, such as coronary artery calcium scores, may be more useful in predicting heart attack and stroke risks.

Interpreting polygenic risk scores can be complex, and ongoing research is necessary to enhance the performance, clinical utility, and limitations of these scores in cardiovascular risk assessment. Factors like race and ethnicity can also influence polygenic risk scores, and the medical community lacks a consensus on the best scoring system. Additionally, it is essential to consider potential psychological outcomes, such as anxiety, associated with high-risk scores, highlighting the importance of counseling alongside genetic testing.

Polygenic risk score testing should only be conducted after consulting with a healthcare professional. While younger individuals with a family history of heart disease may benefit from early testing, patients already displaying signs of heart disease can also utilize polygenic risk scores to tailor treatment and management plans for better disease progression control.

Currently, polygenic risk score testing is not widely available, and it is not covered by insurance. Moreover, it should not be relied upon as the sole method for determining risk levels or treatment plans. Instead, it should be used as part of a comprehensive evaluation that incorporates traditional risk factors, clinical history, and other diagnostic tests.